home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.graphics
- Path: new-news.sprintlink.net!eskimo!news
- From: wendell@eskimo.com (Wendell Watanabe)
- Subject: Re: Which is better? VistaPro or Scenery Animator?
- X-Nntp-Posting-Host: tia1.eskimo.com
- Message-ID: <707.6673T1007T2052@eskimo.com>
- Sender: news@eskimo.com (News User Id)
- Organization: Eskimo North (206) For-Ever
- X-Newsreader: THOR 2.22 (Amiga;TCP/IP)
- References: <4ibtlt$d46@news.internetmci.com> <oj6g2avlfus.fsf@hpsrk.fc.hp.com>
- <1399.6669T1420T210@eskimo.com> <questarDpHGoo.Czn@netcom.com> <4kbcr5$i0a@news.internetmci.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Apr 1996 11:30:39 GMT
-
-
- On the subject of Re: Which is better? VistaPro or Scenery Animator?, Dave
- Gentry had this to say...
-
- DG> questar@netcom.com (Chris Hanson) wrote:
-
- DG> Concerning WCS v2:
-
- >> General landscape detail, tree/foliage realism and antialiasing have
- >>all been improved, in addition to the new water, cloud, rock and
- >>atmospheric effects in V2.
-
- DG> I heard that the trees in WCS were actually bitmapped images, that
- DG> looked fake when zooming in. I also heard that the trees/foliage in
- DG> Vista Pro were more convincing at close range.
-
- Oh, I dunno, have you had a look at "Brookside" on the Questar web site?
-
- http://www.dimensional.com/~questar/
-
- Looks pretty darn good to me!
-
- wendell@eskimo.com
-
-